He Qi 'Calling Disciples' (2001) |
A little oddly, perhaps, the appearance of the disciples Andrew and Peter, which John's Gospel recounted last week, is repeated this week in Matthew's version. There are some important differences between the two, however. Whereas the fourth evangelist tells the story in connection with John the Baptist, Matthew makes a very clear link with the prophet Isaiah, and declares Jesus to be the light that Isaiah prophesied would eventually dawn on those who sit 'in the region and shadow of death'.
It is against this alternative background that Matthew introduces Andrew and Peter, but there is a further subtle and important difference. In John’s version, the initiative in becoming disciples is taken by Andrew and Peter. In Matthew’s version, it is Jesus who calls them, as he does James and John. What is more, he calls them to leave not only the work they are engaged in, but everything that they have. Their response is usually held up as exemplary. 'Immediately they left their nets and followed him'. But what about Zebedee who is left sitting in the boat? Has he no claim on the sons he has raised, and on whose labor he will depend in old age?
Matthew’s version of the call to the disciples is echoed in many other
parts of the Gospel. Following Jesus is repeatedly spoken of as being all
consuming, even to the point of abandoning family responsibilities. Doesn’t
this mean that Christian discipleship requires a kind of fanaticism? How could we answer such
a call ourselves, given our love for parents and children, our belief in the
value of what we do, and our obligations to the wider community?
Vassily Polenv James and John (1904) |
No comments:
Post a Comment